Login Register



Section Navigation
Private Messages (0)
Send Private Message
Public Chat Groups
Services Status
AIM/ICQ Services: Online
Users Online: 37
TOC Services: Online
Phoenix (beta): Offline
Phoenix Desktop: Online
Users Online: ??
Yahoo Services: Online
Users Online: 1
MSN Services: Online
Users Online: ??
Pre-AOL ICQ: -Developing-

News feed brought to you by:
US Is ‘Major’ Cause of Ukraine War – Beijing Goes on Attack as Hegseth Tells Asia Allies China Threat Is ‘Imminent’ --- --- ICE to Increase Deportations to 3,000 Illegals Per Day After Leadership Shake-Up --- --- Nvidia CEO Tells Bloomberg What He Really Thinks About Biden’s Open Borders --- --- Israel Confirms Killing New Hamas Chief --- --- Kremlin Speaks Out on Macron Slap --- --- German Police Union Fumes as Machetes Go on Sale in Berlin Supermarket Despite 79 Knife Crimes Daily --- --- UK to Dramatically Increase Weapons Production --- --- Feds Round Up 40 Illegals in One Day on Posh Massachusetts Islands --- --- WATCH: Masked Marauders Repelled From Hollywood Hills Home “Protected by God and a Gun” --- --- Senators Lindsey Graham (R) & Richard Blumenthal (D) Threaten Russia, China Following Meeting With Ukrainian President Zelensky --- ---



[Reply]
Forum Index > AIM/ICQ Discussion
RmVkZXJhdGlvbiB0byBvdGhlciBzZXJ2ZXJz
Posted on: 02-15 3:24 pm
jschwart
Has it been considered to implement federation with other servers over TCP port 5269 as described in RFC3920 and RFC3921? These RFCs describe the XMPP protocol which provides a mechanism for users on different servers to exchange message with each other.rnrnFor a short time, AIM has this implemented server-side to allow communication with people using Google Talk.rnrnFor the purpose of this project, I don't think the C2S part of XMPP is that interesting to implement, but an implementation of the S2S part would be very interesting!!
< - 1 - >

[Reply]