Login Register



[Reply]
Forum Index > News and Announcements
aim 1.0
Posted on: 09-10 6:43 am
Average Joe

it's awesometacular

404 Forum profile not found.
Posted on: 09-10 6:46 am
charizard

EDIT: iWarg fixed posting threads with no accounts. Attempting to make a thread on News & Announcements now returns the message "hehehe nope.."

Some explanation:

I was the guy that posted those aim 1.0 threads, this was just a test to see if i could post without an account.

You could use this "exploit" to post on News & Announcements with an account. And it's as simple as clicking New on the General Discussion forum and changing the number 6 with 5 on the link, so it looks like this:

http://iwarg.ddns.net/aim/index.php?action=createthread&cat=5

Please fix this, otherwise other people will abuse it.

And to those who will dismiss it with "but iwarg can't possibly fix this it's too complicated!!!", he already blocked off posting replies without an account, so why not threads?

inactive
Posted on: 09-17 2:56 pm
charizard

EDIT: This bug has been patched now. If you go to a category with an ID that is above 9, it will simply show the posts for category 9.

Secret forums!!!

http://iwarg.ddns.net/aim/index.php?action=forums&cat=1
http://iwarg.ddns.net/aim/index.php?action=forums&cat=2
http://iwarg.ddns.net/aim/index.php?action=forums&cat=3
http://iwarg.ddns.net/aim/index.php?action=forums&cat=4
http://iwarg.ddns.net/aim/index.php?action=forums&cat=8

You can apparently type a random number at the end and it will lead you to a working forum with no posts (for example cat=69 and cat=420 are functional sub-forums but obviously have no posts) so the ones i just linked are not all of the secret sub-forums. Theoretically, this means there are infinite sub-forums just waiting for someone to make a post on.

BTW, All of them are named "'Secret' Forum". At first i thought there were only cat=1-4 but since there are "infinite" subforums, who knows? This could probably be an easter egg.

inactive
Posted on: 12-31 1:45 pm
charizard

No, i was the OP. I found a loophole to post a thread without an account, but it was patched a few days after i brought it up.

inactive
< - 1 - >

[Reply]