Login Register
“Complete Betrayal”: Starmer, von der Leyen Agree on Largest Brexit Reset to Date --- --- Apple-Alibaba AI Deal in China Triggers US National Security Concerns Over Data Sharing and Military Ties --- --- BREAKING 2A BOMBSHELL: Trump Set To Restore 2nd Amendment By Essentially Repealing The 1968 Gun Control Act Using The Power Of Mass Pardons For US Citizens Convicted Of Nonviolent Felonies! --- --- BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: The DOJ’s New ‘Weaponization Working Group’ To Be Led By Ed Martin Will Investigate & Dismantle/Prosecute Government Agencies & Individuals That Have Been Targeting Americans For Total Destruction --- --- Destroyed from Within: President Biden’s Health Is the Greatest Political Scandal in American History --- --- Script Flipped: Shock Cancer Diagnosis Wipes Biden Autopen-Presidency From Headlines — Alex Jones Responds! --- --- The WHO Cannot Be Saved --- --- Reason & Argument Are Cool & All. But Have You Tried Prejudice? --- --- Disgusting: Canada Promotes Euthanasia WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT For Children & Teens Suffering From Mental Health Issues --- --- Monday War Room Live: Another Massive Biden Scandal Exposed – Biden Had Cancer While President And The White House Covered It Up For Years! --- ---



[Reply]
Forum Index > AIM/ICQ Discussion
Using Phoenix AIM with Spectrum2 (Screenshot)
Posted on: 01-22 5:07 pm
ohhihohello57

Could you elaborate on what "encryption" you're talking about? And in what aspect? Login or messaging?

For login, up until AIM 6 the only options for authentication were XOR-based (deprecated) and MD5-based, which was used until 5.9, which was released in 2005 of all things. Both aren't really encryption per se. And to my knowledge Pidgin even in 2003 used whatever authentication method AIM's server supported, so there's no way to avoid that.

As for messaging, I doubt that will be doable since official AIM clients (AFAIK) don't support anything of the sort, and expecting that to be forced onto everyone wouldn't make much sense.

if (Nerd->Personality == (NERD_PERSON_FRONTFACING + NERD_PERSON_SMARTALEC)) { return; }
Posted on: 01-22 9:09 pm
X3N0

ohhihohello57 Said:
'Could you elaborate on what "encryption" you're talking about? And in what aspect? Login or messaging?

For login, up until AIM 6 the only options for authentication were XOR-based (deprecated) and MD5-based, which was used until 5.9, which was released in 2005 of all things. And to my knowledge Pidgin even in 2003 used whatever authentication method AIM's server supported, so there's no way to avoid that.

As for messaging, I doubt that will be doable since official AIM clients (AFAIK) don't support anything of the sort, and expecting that to be forced onto everyone wouldn't make much sense.'

heres where md5 went..?
https://md5decrypt.net/en/
It can be decrypted, right here..online.

Those who follow the river, can fall in.
Posted on: 01-22 10:31 pm
ohhihohello57

That's one of those rainbow table things where the hash and "decrypted" result are manually defined, and it's not perfect (which is good). In fact, I tried a long sentence, "abc", and "md5", all hashed to MD5, and decrypted it with the site, only to get errors stating the hashes weren't in the database. I probably should've specified that neither XOR or MD5 are "encryption". I just wanted to bring up how login for anything below AIM 6 isn't perfect.

if (Nerd->Personality == (NERD_PERSON_FRONTFACING + NERD_PERSON_SMARTALEC)) { return; }
Posted on: 01-23 12:52 am
X3N0

ohhihohello57 Said:
'That's one of those rainbow table things where the hash and "decrypted" result are manually defined, and it's not perfect (which is good). In fact, I tried a long sentence, "abc", and "md5", all hashed to MD5, and decrypted it with the site, only to get errors stating the hashes weren't in the database. I probably should've specified that neither XOR or MD5 are "encryption". I just wanted to bring up how login for anything below AIM 6 isn't perfect.'

Yes and the decryption of md5 is partly why, i dont know the story. So no im not pointing at that website, im sure theres an official story. So AIM6+ uses SSL? And it is?
;]

Those who follow the river, can fall in.
Posted on: 01-23 1:21 am
ohhihohello57

X3N0 Said:
'So AIM6+ uses SSL? And it is?
;]'


Well only for login though. AFAIK the rest is basically the same.

if (Nerd->Personality == (NERD_PERSON_FRONTFACING + NERD_PERSON_SMARTALEC)) { return; }
Posted on: 01-23 3:01 am
X3N0

Yeah, so i assumed ssl was only for websites. So its 443 port, tho. You can always self sign. I actually had a vps website up for a year and had one from a 'free' issuer.
Then begin to wonder something, i assumed it needed both.
I also had a text filed checked and a few other things, that i thought 'anchored' the site.

Then theres paid for ssl tickets...speaking of that id check here out.namecheap.com

Those who follow the river, can fall in.
Posted on: 01-24 9:56 am
Asha

SSL is used all ovver the place. I use SSL over XMPP, HTTPS, IMAP4 with E-mail and a Dozen other things.

The issue is that my Messages become unencrypted when my Spectrum 2 Server Changes my XMPP messages into AIM/OSCAR. This will only be fixed when iWarg AIM 6.x and moves to a more permanent provider like afraid.org.

As well as setting up HTTPS on his Web Server. He'll have to Self Sign everything and interested parties will need to import his CA Key, or he'll have to get his key signed by a Public CA.
Posted on: 01-24 5:30 pm
ohhihohello57

I think right now it's for the better your gateway server decrypts messages since the OSCAR protocol by itself doesn't support encrypted messages as I said before. At some point however clientLogin became a thing which allowed support for SSL encryption of OSCAR messages, so when that's supported I guess that will solve your issue.

Also how will moving to another host fix the encryption, if any?

if (Nerd->Personality == (NERD_PERSON_FRONTFACING + NERD_PERSON_SMARTALEC)) { return; }
< - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - >

[Reply]